Thread: Can I calculate the radius of a circle from arc length and arc height alone?

Hi there

I have a problem which I thought would be quite easy when I was out on site.
I have a curved bridge which I am assuming is part of a circle.

I measured the arc length AL and by pulling a string taught and dropping a ruler down measured the distance from the centre of the arc to the chord which I call h.

I thought that these two measurements must define an individual circle, and did not make an attempt to measure the chord length.

I am now trying to define the radius and angle etc. of the arc but cannot do this algebraically. I could probably attack this iteratively to find the particular solution using excel but I'd like to know if there is a direct equation to solve this.

I have been through a few sides of A4 trying to solve this and suspect I do not have enough information, so here is some of my equations I have written but cannot see how to combine them to get r the radius or theta alone.

r = radius
theta = half the included angle
AL = arc length
CL = chord length
h = Arc Height ( max distance from chord to Arc)


r*cos (theta) = r-h
CL = 2*r*sin( theta )
AL = r * theta
r^2 = (CL/2)^2 + (r-h)^2

What approach should I be taking?

(I have found an online calculator that has given me a result but I am frustrated with my own attempts to solve it directly)

Any help would be most appreciated.

Thanks

Matt

This is a classic problem that goes back to the Babylonians and is called the "bow and arrow" problem. (The arc of the circle and chord are the bow and bowstring. The radius through the center is the arrow.)

Call the length of the chord "l" and the height, from chord to arc at the center of the arc, "h". Call the (unknown) radius of the circle "r". The distance from the center of the circle to either end of the arc is r, the radius. The distance from the center of the circle to the center of the chord is r- h. The distance from the center of the chord to one endpoint is l/2. Those lines form a right triangle so, by the Pythagorean theorm, which, multiplying that first square, is and then, canceling the " " terms, reduces to . We can write that as and so .

Hi there

Thanks for the quick reply.

I may have confused Arc length and the chord length in my initial statement. I have the measurement around the outside of the arc and the height from the chord to the arc not the chord length itself.

Unfortunately I did not measure the chord length on site assuming I had enough information already to cal the rest. I only have the arc length, and the height. I have been trying to calculate the chord length from the arc length and height alone. Surely there is only one chord length for a given height and arc length ? When I can calculate the chord length I can then use the equation you've given me (nice explanation by the way) to get the radius and the rest.

Am I missing something startlingly obvious perhaps to do with triangles within circles?

Thanks again

Matt

Originally Posted by hairymarmite

Unfortunately I did not measure the chord length on site assuming I had enough information already to cal the rest. I only have the arc length, and the height. I have been trying to calculate the chord length from the arc length and height alone. Surely there is only one chord length for a given height and arc length ? When I can calculate the chord length I can then use the equation you've given me (nice explanation by the way) to get the radius and the rest.

Am I missing something startlingly obvious perhaps to do with triangles within circles?

Have a look at this page.
You can see how a change in radius changes cord length.
There are many formulas there that may help you.

I think I have convinced myself, that I cannot define a single circle from the two figures alone.

The chord length measurement would fix the ends of thew arc a certain distance apart and the radius and the angle can then be calculated.
I can imagine that a large radius arc would have a small angle and give both the same height and arc length as a smaller radius arc with a larger angle would.

I've pictured it in my head but haven't done the math and it makes sense, though I now have a head ache.


Plugging equations into each other gave me the following (unless I've made a mistake somewhere)

cos theta = 1 - h/R
since arc length AL = 2 * R * theta
I wrote
cos ( AL/2R ) = 1 - h/R


thanks for the pointers
let me know if I am wrong about this.

Matt

Hi Matt,

The arc of a bridge span is a catenary curve