No. I said that DG is one of those subjects you will think is useless. However, somebody found an application to it, i.e. Einstein.
Are you contradicting yourself? You cited Einstein as an example of "mathematicians" who founded "math something" that can be used. Then, again you said Einstein is not mathematician. Are you, uh, trying to bluff your way out of this trap?
The forum also has physics questions, does not mean they are math questions. The Calculus sequence course (I,II,III) is a basic course anyone who is going into science related stuff must be familar with. But mathemations do not use it. They do not use the same Caluculus that is taught in the I,II,III sequence. They use an analogue (something related to it) called Analysis. It is extremely similar to Calculus, but it is much more detailed, as mentioned, what mathemations need. The reason why Calculus is not used is because it is informal and intuitive.
This Forum exist. You believe that?
In this Forum there are a lot of Calculus questions. You answered some of them.
You consider yourself a "mathematician", so how do we see that?
"You just answered Calculus questions, but you did not "use" Calculus."
Or, " Your are not a mathematician because you are using Calculus in answering some questions here."
But you do not know it. You do not know what it is about. You do not see how it can be used.
I do not despise Advanced Math in the same way I do not despise Greek, Chinese, Afghan languages.
As mentioned there is only one kind of mathemations, i.e. those that think like me (except maybe rare exceptions). However, you will not find a single mathemation who thinks like you think. I gave you many many examples of what I said. However, you did not give one. Give an example of a mathemation from the modern era who said that anything beyond Calculus is useless.
Is that so? And who said that? Your kind of "mathematicians"?
I also took them, they seem accurate. But that does not mean you are a mathemtion, it is saying you analyze stuff like mathemations do, and hence are cabable of understanding it better than regular people. In a sense it is saying you can purse math.
In some of the free IQ tests in the Internet, I was called a "mathematician" of some sorts after my answers were evaluated. I have not proven any theorem, so the group behind those IQ tests are lying?