I have a problem with "Russell's paradox" which I have just learned about at school. Simply said, it means that:
Let's say we have sets R and A. And according to Russell's paradox (or theory) there cannot exist such set R, that:
But I think that such set "exist"...
What exactly means that ? Then the set A could be one of these:
And what means that ? Then the set A could be one of these:
So let's say that .
...so I have found such set R that:
So where is the paradox ?