suppose that f:N->N and g:N->N are defined by f(n)=nto the power of 3 and g(n)=n to the power of 2 for each natural number n.Show that gof not equal to fog.
Printable View
suppose that f:N->N and g:N->N are defined by f(n)=nto the power of 3 and g(n)=n to the power of 2 for each natural number n.Show that gof not equal to fog.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kodirl
Then,
Also,
Thus,
Thus, saying that they are no equal is wrong.
Is that the actual answer and how it should be wrtten?
It should be writen as PerfectHacker wrote it!Quote:
Originally Posted by kodirl
Suppose that f:N->N and g:N-> are defined by f(n)=n^3 and g(n)=n^2 for each natural number n.Show that gof is not equal fog???? ;)
Hello, Colette!
Is there a typo in the problem? . . . The statement is wrong.
Quote:
Suppose thatand
are defined by
and
for each natural number
Show that![]()
We have: .. . . These are equal!
Suppose that f:N->N and g:N-> are defined by f(n)=n^3 and g(n)=n^2-2 for each natural number n.Show that gof is not equal fog???? thats the correct version
Ahh there's a -2 that cropped up this time.
Let
Well the domain for both is the natural numbers, but I noticed that the you left off the codomain for the function g. I don't know why, but I would venture to guess because its codomain has to include -1, which isn't in the natural numbers.
So letbe the codomain of g so that
.
So in other words, the function g spits out something inbut f can only handle things from
. So
doesn't make sense because
.
(Notestill can make sense, but it's certainly not possible that
)
Hello, Colette!
Ah, much better . . .
Quote:
Suppose thatand
are defined by
and
for all natural numbers
.
Show that![]()
![]()
Obviously, these two expression are equal for only specific values of.
As it turns out, there are no real values offor which the two composites are equal.