Common sense suggests there are only two possible outcomes: TuesdayBoy+Boy, and TuesdayBoy+girl, each with a probability of 1/2.Select all people who have two children, at least one of which is a boy born on Tuesday. Given one of those individuals, what is the probability that their other child is a boy?
But some hard-charging pundit for the other team has gone on to suggest otherwise by creating an outcome space like so:
Mon-Boy Tue-Boy Wed-Boy Thu-Boy Fri-Boy Sat-Boy Sun-Boy Mon-Girl Tue-Girl Wed-Girl Thu-Girl Fri-Girl Sat-Girl Sun-Girl Mon-Boy
XXXXXX
Tue-Boy XXXXXX
XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX Wed-Boy
XXXXXX
Thu-Boy
XXXXXX
Fri-Boy
XXXXXX
Sat-Boy
XXXXXX
Sun-Boy
XXXXXX
Mon-Girl
XXXXXX
Tue-Girl
XXXXXX
Wed-Girl
XXXXXX
Thu-Girl
XXXXXX
Fri-Girl
XXXXXX
Sat-Girl
XXXXXX
Sun-Girl
XXXXXX
From this table of outcomes, 27/196 possible two-child families have at least one Tuesday-Boy. Furthermore, 13/196 outcomes are TuesdayBoy+Boy, while 14/196 outcomes are TuesdayBoy+girl. And I'm willing to believe that drawing a random entry from this outcome space will result in TuesdayBoy+Boy with a probability of 13/196, and TuesdayBoy+Girl with a probability of 14/196.
But I'm pretty sure the assessment that this represents the quoted question accurately is in error. And I think the mechanism of selecting the subset of qualified results is the source of that error.
Any help?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks