Hello,
I've got to solve a following problem.
f is a function like this. And two sets
. I've got to figure out how are the following two sets related:
and
I got to here:
Can I assume through this that? If so then how to correctly justify it?
Printable View
Hello,
I've got to solve a following problem.
f is a function like this. And two sets
. I've got to figure out how are the following two sets related:
and
I got to here:
Can I assume through this that? If so then how to correctly justify it?
Then
So is the following proof correct?
So let's assume that setis defined like this
, this means that
and
.
So let's take anysuch that
, then
Since, this means that
So I have proven that, in other words
Butis not a subset of
which can be proven by a counterexample like the one above.
Is this right?