Is the following a tautology?
On my exam there is always a question like this:
Is the following a tautology:
[(r -> q) -> p] ↔ [r -> (q -> p)]
I know how to solve this pretty easy by using a truth table or by just thinking a bit about the logic behind the statement. I was just wondering, is there some easier way to do this? I know about logical equivalence identities, but I find them difficult to apply to these kind of problems.
Thanks to anyone who reads this!
Re: Is the following a tautology?