Thread: Don't even understand what it is trying to say: Predicate calculus

Originally Posted by gomdohri

What does it mean by 'where y is not free in A'?

You need to consult your source (textbook or lecture notes). They must have a definition. Or see here in Wikipedia.

Do you need a Fitch-style or tree-like natural deduction derivation?

Informally, the derivation looks as follows.

1. Assume E y. ( A -> P(y)).
2. Assume A.
3. From 1 take y and the proof of A -> P(y) (existential elimination).
4. From 2 and 3 conclude P(y) by MP.
5. From 4 conclude Ey. P(y).
6. Close the assumption A from 2.

Note that to prove the converse implication you need to use the rule of double-negation elimination or the law of excluded middle.

Edit: After you construct a formal derivation, make sure you understand where the assumption that y is not free in A is used. This is the point of the exercise. If you need help with this, feel free to ask.