Hello,
Can anyone help me understand how to derive the local LYM inequality from the LYM inequality?
Thanks in advance.
They're fairly standard theorems, I thought they'd be well-known as they trivially imply Sperner's theorem/lemma about the maximal size of an antichain.
The LYM inequality states that given an antichainon [n], let
i.e the number of sets of size
in
Then
.
Now the local LYM inequality states that ifthen
, where
is the lower shadow of the antichain
, in symbols
.
In the above notation,. Each implies the other, but I'm struggling to show properly that the first inequality implies the second.