Can anyone provide a proof, plz? I need to understand how the proof works, 10x in advance...(Happy)
Printable View
Can anyone provide a proof, plz? I need to understand how the proof works, 10x in advance...(Happy)
Letand let
where
. In particular,
. Then we can construct
such that
is not in the image of
. Namely, define
. Then it is easy to extend
to
so that
is still not in the image of
.
thank you very much, can I ask you what is the procedure to deal with this kind of questions?
See also Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel.
In general, when we are dealing with infinite sets, the cardinality of many set operations depends only on the cardinality of the larger set. In particular, finite set don't matter compared to countably infinite sets, and those don't matter compared to continuum. So, if B is infinite and(the cardinality of A is less than or equal to the cardinality of B), then
and
.
Thank you for the reference and the explanation, it was very helpful 😃