Leta directed graph with a length-function
. Furthermore assume that
has a vertex
with no incoming arrows, and for all
there exists a path from
to
Letbe the length of the shortest path from
to
with at most
arrows.
I've been asked to show:has a circuit with negative length
for some
![]()
(the question doesn't say if it's for all n or not, but I assume that's what they mean).
I think that it's nonsense, since I think the following is a counterexample:
Leta circuit with negative value, and add
an arrow. Then we have a graph that has exactly all desired properties.
But now we havefor all
for all
. But it's not true that
for all
( for most
we have
).
Can someone make this make sense to me? :P
Thanks :/


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

