I think my text defines it as starting from 0. In that case, sigma is {(0,0),(1,1)}. Then it is a prefix of tau according to your example. Am I wrong?

Printable View

- May 21st 2011, 05:18 PMSneaky
I think my text defines it as starting from 0. In that case, sigma is {(0,0),(1,1)}. Then it is a prefix of tau according to your example. Am I wrong?

- May 21st 2011, 05:20 PMemakarov
I would rather say, sigma, as defined above, is not a sequence.

- May 21st 2011, 05:21 PMSneaky
This is a summary of a definition of a sequence from my text:

A sequence of n elements taken

from set A is a function mapping from {0,1,2,...,n-1} to A. If

we call the n elements a_1,a_2,...,a_n, then the sequence is the

function that maps 0 to a_1, 1 to a_2, 2 to a_3, ..., and n-1 to

a_n. Such a function, seen as a relation, is the set of ordered

pairs {(0,a_1),(1,a_2),...,(n-1,a_n)}. E.g., the sequence <

H,E,L,L,O >, is the set {(0,H),(1,E),(2,L),(3,L),(4,O)}.

Does this change anything that you were saying?

With this in mind I still can't come up with a proper counter example, nor can I understand your example properly. - May 21st 2011, 05:23 PMPlato
I truly mean you no disrespect by this comment.

But this is an English language forum.

As such, we have very clear definitions of terms.

A sequence is a function from the positive integers to a field, real or complex.

If the sequence is a subsequence of then where .

In that westernized context, can you reframe your question?

If not, you need to find a forum that is compatible your language. - May 21st 2011, 05:24 PMemakarovQuote:

Does this change anything that you were saying?

It would be helpful if you posted this definition from the start. Such ubiquitous things as sequences often have slightly different definitions. - May 21st 2011, 05:30 PMSneaky
OK, I'm just stuck with one thing, if you say it does not change anything you said before, and when when you say sigma is {<1,1>}, then according to the definition I posted, shouldn't it be the same as {<0,0>,<1,1>}?

- May 21st 2011, 05:34 PMemakarov
- May 21st 2011, 05:39 PMSneaky
So technically with that definition of sequence, there is no counter example to show that sigma is a prefix of tau but not a subset. But if sequences don't have to be defined on an initial segment of natural numbers, then your example is a valid counter example.

Is this right? - May 21st 2011, 05:40 PMemakarov
Yes.

Edit: In case sequences don't have to be defined on an initial segment, my example shows that being a subset does not imply being a prefix. For the other direction under the same definition, let sigma = {(1,0)} and tau = {(0,0), (1,1)}. Then sigma (representing the sequence <0>) is a prefix of tau (representing <0,1>), but is not a subset of tau. - May 21st 2011, 06:03 PMSneaky
OK, thanks.