What do you mean by "explicit form"? If you want to get that expression in terms of only, you may not get one. You already have a recursive relation between and ; and this may be the most general form of the sequence.
I have a series:
i want to find a explicit form for
and prove it with induction.
i calculated some values to use:
i tried something like this:
but im having a hard time finding a dominator that works with my values.
Maybe i´m doing it all wrong
regards mechaniac