Hello, jeremy5561!
skeeter is right . . . An inductive proof is in order.
Even then, I had difficulty with the inductive step.
Perhaps someone has a better method . . .
. .
. . .
. . . . . . .
And we must show that is a multiple of 25.
. . That is, that is a multiple of 5.
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. .
But there must be a better way!
.