Prove:

and an example where inclusion is strict

and an example where inclusion is strict

I'm not understanding the composition of the intersection

Printable View

- Jan 28th 2011, 09:59 AMgutnedawgRelations
Prove:

and an example where inclusion is strict

and an example where inclusion is strict

I'm not understanding the composition of the intersection - Jan 28th 2011, 10:06 AMPlato
- Jan 28th 2011, 10:14 AMgutnedawg
I know it is true I need to prove it and no I did not miss write the last part

- Jan 28th 2011, 10:17 AMPlato
Please answer both of my questions.

The second one you wrote is meaningless. - Jan 28th 2011, 10:22 AMgutnedawg
I have prove one of the modular laws for realtions R, S, T

or

- Jan 28th 2011, 10:44 AMPlato
The way both of those are written makes totally meaningless.

Look at the way I used parentheses in post #2.

Without parentheses there is no way to know what goes with what.

In the second one it makes no sense to have in it.

If you cannot provide a readable question, the we cannot help.

Now here is the proof of a standard question.

If then .

That also means .

Or . - Jan 28th 2011, 11:44 AMgutnedawg

is the inverse relation