Here is another part of the question:
For part (c), this is what I've done so far:
suppose both e and é are identities ofand suppose
. Therefore
xe=x .....(1)
xé=x .....(2)
Since, we can set x=é in equation (1) and set x=e in equation (2)
ée=é
eé=e
Thus e and é are equal and the identity is uniqe.
Is this correct? I think the problem here is that I've shown that the identity ofis unique but I have not shown that it must have an identity. Can anyone help?
For part (d), I did this:
Let.
Suppose b and c are both inverses of a. Thenalso
. Hence
.
Again, I think my approach just shows the uniqueness, and not the existence of an inverse... I appreciate any help with this.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



