My book shows that the set of integers,is denumerable by expressing the elements of the set as infinite sequence
, and then shows that the function
is bijective, where
is defined as
The picture shows that there is one-one correspondence, such as this:
.
.
.
Now I want to prove thatbijective, but
in the expression is making it very clumsy.
To prove the one-to-one isn't too bad, sinceseems to look clean, but now when I get to the part where I need to prove it an onto function, I got a huge mess, so I am wondering whether it be alright to split the proof in two parts such that
and define
and
and by so doing, I plan to prove that
there exists an odd positive integersuch that
where
and there also exists an even positive integersuch that
where
Questions:
1. Is there a simpler way than to prove the onto-function in two parts?
2. Is there a better way with handlingexpression ?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

