May be you can get another free ride.
May be you can get another free ride.
Is this a pretty good proof? this is what I came up with so far....
Thank you Archie Meade
Prrof: Let P(n): 3^n-1
then let n=1 3^1=2 2 is divisible by 2.
Suppose P(k): 3^(k-1)=2m for some integer m.
Multiply by 3... 3^(k+1)-3=2*3=6m
subtract 2 from each side... 3^k+(1-1)=6m-2= **2(3m-1)**
since 3m-1 is an integer then 3^(k+1)-1 is 2 times an integer, therefore it is divisible by 2.
Thus by PMI 3^n-1 is divisible by 2.
[]
I dont really get it
The simplest and most common form of mathematical induction proves that a statement involving a natural number n holds for all values of n. The proof consists of two steps:
- The basis (base case): showing that the statement holds when n is equal to the lowest value that n is given in the question. Usually, n = 0 or n = 1.
- The inductive step: showing that if the statement holds for some n, then the statement also holds when n + 1 is substituted for n.
The assumption in the inductive step that the statement holds for some n is called the induction hypothesis (or inductive hypothesis). To perform the inductive step, one assumes the induction hypothesis and then uses this assumption to prove the statement for n + 1.
The choice between n = 0 and n = 1 in the base case is specific to the context of the proof: If 0 is considered a natural number, as is common in the fields of combinatorics and mathematical logic, then n = 0. If, on the other hand, 1 is taken as the first natural number, then the base case is given by n = 1.
This method works by first proving the statement is true for a starting value, and then proving that the process used to go from one value to the next is valid. If these are both proven, then any value can be obtained by performing the process repeatedly. It may be helpful to think of the domino effect; if one is presented with a long row of dominoes standing on end, one can be sure that:
- The first domino will fall
- Whenever a domino falls, its next neighbor will also fall,
so it is concluded that all of the dominoes will fall, and that this fact is inevitable.
Another analogy can be to consider a set of identical lily pads, all equally spaced in a line across a pond, with the first and last lily pads adjacent to the two sides of the pond. If a frog wishes to traverse the pond, he must:
- Determine if the first lily pad will hold his weight.
- Prove that he can jump from one lily pad to another.
Thus, he can conclude that he can jump to all of the lily pads, however many lily pads there are, and cross the pond.
Mathematical induction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
hi matthayzon89,
Is divisible by 2 ?
is divisible by 2
is divisible by 2
is divisible by 2
so it looks as though it may be true.
What Proof By Induction attempts to do is show whether the following is true or not...
Being divisible by 2 for a first value of n causes to be divisible by 2 for the next n, the 2nd one.
Being divisible by 2 for the 2nd value of n causes to be divisible by 2 for the 3rd value of n.
Being divisible by 2 for the 3rd n causes divisibility by 2 for the 4th n.
Being divisible by 2 for the 4th n causes divisibility by 2 for the 5th n.
We want to prove whether or not this keeps going as n goes to infinity.
That would take a long time!
We are trying to establish an infinite chain of cause and effect.
We can do this by showing that being divisible by 2 causes to be divisible by 2.
If you think about this, by proving the previous statement "in terms of n"
we are in fact proving the following....
True for n=1 causes the statement to be true for n=2.
True for n=2 causes true for n=3.
True for n=3 causes true for n=4.
True for n=4 causes true for n=5................
is the value for any natural number
is the value for the next n.
We want to see whether or not being divisible by 2 will cause to be divisible by 2 also.
Proof
Now we can see that since is a multiple of 2
being divisible by 2 does cause to be divisible by 2.
Since, we have already checked this for the first value of n,
then the formula is true for all natural n.
I would only add this. Identifying induction statement P(n) (it also is the induction hypothesis) is the most crucial step. The rest is done with little thinking and some algebra. But! P(n) is a proposition, not a number! P(n) can be true or false, but it cannot be 3^n-1.Prrof: Let P(n): 3^n-1
then let n=1 3^1=2 2 is divisible by 2.
Suppose P(k): 3^(k-1)=2m for some integer m.
Here P(n) is "3^n - 1 is even". Writing the induction hypothesis P(n) and the claim to prove P(n + 1) is crucial for doing the induction step right.
We are to prove being divisible by 2 for every positive integer .
Proof:
We proceed by induction.
Basis step: When , the result holds since .
Inductive step:
Assume that for every positive integer . Then for some integer x. We show that
From the assumption . We must begin with
. Multiplying through by 3,
. For last step, we add 2 to bothsides.
Since is an integer,
Therefore, by induction, for every positive integer .