Hi
Do you know an exemple of connected space but path connected in no open subset (except perhaps the whole space) ?
Printable View
Hi
Do you know an exemple of connected space but path connected in no open subset (except perhaps the whole space) ?
Could anyone tell me if that's a wrong exemple (but I think it works): in
By the way, can you please give the definitions that you use?
connected and path connected?
Definitions I use is:
connected iff for all
disjoint open subsets in
or
is path connected iff between any two points
in
there is always a path. (a continuous map
from
to
such that
and
)
Why not only considering
which has the same nature with the first quadrant of
It is clear that this set is not path connected.
Because the mappingwill have discontinuity while matching
and
for some
and
, for instance when
, and in any open subset you may find such points (may be sketching a graphic would help for this).
In this case, you will always havefor some
.
About the connectivity, I am not sure for this set.
You're right it's not path-connected, but unfortunately it's not connected: you can write this space as a disjoint union of non trivial open sets, for instance:
![]()
(this sets are open because they are intersections with open subsets in, and we're working with subspace topology)
But the space I was looking for may be more complicated: it has to be connected, but, instead of not path connected, not path-connected in any open subset (i.e. if you want never locally path-connected), and I'm not sure that (not path-connected)
(
not path-connected in any open subset)...
Okay, please see here Connected and Path Connected
I guess this will help you much, and indicates that your assertion is true.