Differentials and Integrating
*EDIT: Whoops, wrong forum. This can be moved if needed. Sorry.
Hello,
I'm really having a bit of trouble here. I'm doing an online course with limited recorded lectures and a textbook which is helpful only some of the time, so I'm hoping for a little bit of guidance here. (Headbang)
I have problem in which I've managed to write a differential equation to represent the problem. In the problem, C is defined as calories per day, so it's not an 'arbitrary constant'. I'm supposed to solve the equation, but I don't really know how to go about it.



I fall down a little bit here, as I don't know exactly how to deal with C (the constant), whether the dt on the right, is just t??


From here it just kind of falls to pieces, and I don't know whether I am supposed to get the 1/C to the other side, then divide by 17.5, then get rid of the natural log, or whether I messed up an earlier step.
I really wish the lectures explained this sort of question a little better...
Re: Differentials and Integrating
Quote:
Originally Posted by
astuart
*EDIT: Whoops, wrong forum. This can be moved if needed. Sorry.
Hello,
I'm really having a bit of trouble here. I'm doing an online course with limited recorded lectures and a textbook which is helpful only some of the time, so I'm hoping for a little bit of guidance here. (Headbang)
I have problem in which I've managed to write a differential equation to represent the problem. In the problem, C is defined as calories per day, so it's not an 'arbitrary constant'. I'm supposed to solve the equation, but I don't really know how to go about it.
I fall down a little bit here, as I don't know exactly how to deal with C (the constant), whether the dt on the right, is just t??
From here it just kind of falls to pieces, and I don't know whether I am supposed to get the 1/C to the other side, then divide by 17.5, then get rid of the natural log, or whether I messed up an earlier step.
I really wish the lectures explained this sort of question a little better...
First of all
is a constant, so its integral will be
. As for the LHS, rewrite it as
so that you can use the substitution
and the integral becomes
.
Re: Differentials and Integrating
Your separation of the variables is good up to here:

although I would write:

Now, in your next step, you pulled a
out in front of the integral as if it were a factor, which is is not. You did not have:

If you did, then what you did would have been fine. So, let's go back to:

Let's multiply the integral on the left by 



Now, observe that the integral on the left is of the form
...can you finish?
Re: Differentials and Integrating
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MarkFL2
Your separation of the variables is good up to here:
although I would write:
Now, in your next step, you pulled a

out in front of the integral as if it were a factor, which is is not. You did not have:
If you did, then what you did would have been fine. So, let's go back to:
Let's multiply the integral on the left by
Now, observe that the integral on the left is of the form

...can you finish?
I think so...However, I don't understand why
became
. I realize they're equivalent, but is there a reason for doing it?




Is this right? When I ran it through Wolfram, it gave me a different answer, which I just can't see how it got to that point..
Re: Differentials and Integrating
You forgot to include a parameter representing the constant of integration.