limit of a sequence -> possibly squeeze theorem
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8606/qqqqbj.jpg
so what i'm thinking is that you let
x_n+3 + x_n+2<=x_n+2 + x_n+1 <= x_2 + x_1
then show that the first term can eventually go to the last term
squeezing the term into the middle
but the problem with this is i dont see where the 1/3 comes from
any ideas?
Re: limit of a sequence -> possibly squeeze theorem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Angela11
so what i'm thinking is that you let
x_n+3 + x_n+2<=x_n+2 + x_n+1 <= x_2 + x_1
What do you mean by "let"? One uses the word "let" during a definition: e.g., let w = 6. Why do you think these inequalities are true?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Angela11
any ideas?
One way is to find an explicit formula for
. It is convenient to define
and
so that xₙ = (aₙx₁ + bₙx₂) / 2ⁿ⁻². Then it is possible to write recurrence relations and initial conditions on aₙ and bₙ, solve them and find the limits of aₙ / 2ⁿ⁻² and bₙ / 2ⁿ⁻².
Re: limit of a sequence -> possibly squeeze theorem
The way to do simple linear recursions is to try
. This is very much analogous to ODEs, where you'd try
, seeing what f must be, and then using superposition to add together the different possibilities for f.
Solve:
.
Solution: Try
for some constants 
From
get
, so
.
Solving that gives
or
. Now just like with ODEs, put them together to get the general form of the solution:
.
Note the required 2 unknown constants for a degree 2 linear recursion.
When you plug that in to the recursion equation, it works. It's just algebra - I won't work it out here. Thus we have the generic solution to that recursion.
Just like with ODEs, we use the initial conditions to get the specific solution:
, and
. Thus
, and
, which add to give
, so
.
To solve the problem, we don't even need to bother to find
, though it would be simple to do.
^n}\right) = a_0 = \frac{x_1 + 2x_2}{3})