Converge or diverge plus show why

show why the con/diverge:

i think she diverges. because the terms get bigger (closer to 1 each) so you are just adding almost 1 + 1 +1 +1 ... it tails off to infinity... diverge... but i think i need to use a rigurous proof not just intuition.

i'd say she converges since the denom gets rapidly massive so the whole thing is getting rapidly tiny... i can't see what it converges too though? and how to show it?

as above, i think its the same.

but i don't know how to show these using the whole episolon thing. the epsilon thing really bugs me. do i need the epsilon thing? can someone help me to show these things rather than just use intuition... also am i right or wrong???

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** show why the con/diverge:

i think she diverges. because the terms get bigger (closer to 1 each) so you are just adding almost 1 + 1 +1 +1 ... it tails off to infinity... diverge... but i think i need to use a rigurous proof not just intuition.

i'd say she converges since the denom gets rapidly massive so the whole thing is getting rapidly tiny... i can't see what it converges too though? and how to show it?

as above, i think its the same.

but i don't know how to show these using the whole episolon thing. the epsilon thing really bugs me. do i need the epsilon thing? can someone help me to show these things rather than just use intuition... also am i right or wrong???

In the first one , so... ?

The second one:

In the third: use Ratio test - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Also sprach Zarathustra**

1st - divergent by nonnull tesT??

2nd - i still dont see enough info, i would try the comparison test, again i come up short? or is this better to use absolute convergence properties?

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** 2nd - i still dont see enough info, i would try the comparison test, again i come up short? or is this better to use absolute convergence properties?

The point is if a series converges absolutely it converges period.

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** show why the con/diverge:

i think she diverges. because the terms get bigger (closer to 1 each) so you are just adding almost 1 + 1 +1 +1 ... it tails off to infinity... diverge... but i think i need to use a rigurous proof not just intuition.

i'd say she converges since the denom gets rapidly massive so the whole thing is getting rapidly tiny... i can't see what it converges too though? and how to show it?

as above, i think its the same.

but i don't know how to show these using the whole episolon thing. the epsilon thing really bugs me. do i need the epsilon thing? can someone help me to show these things rather than just use intuition... also am i right or wrong???

A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a series to converge is that the individual terms have to tend to 0.

Therefore, a valid way to show that a series diverges is to show that the individual terms do NOT tend to 0.

For the first

Clearly, the terms do not tend to 0, so the series diverges.

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** 1st - divergent by nonnull tesT??

2nd - i still dont see enough info, i would try the comparison test, again i come up short? or is this better to use absolute convergence properties?

Think about it like this. Suppose you have some series. Since there may be some negative values in it, the sum will never be any greater than the sum of the absolute values of the terms (since they are all positive). Therefore, by the comparison test, if the "larger series" (the series of absolute values) converges, then so must the "smaller series" (the original series).

So for your second series, by showing that converges, you show also converges.

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Prove It** A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a series to converge is that the individual terms have to tend to 0.

Therefore, a valid way to show that a series diverges is to show that the individual terms do NOT tend to 0.

For the first

Clearly, the terms do not tend to 0, so the series diverges.

thats what we call nonnull test. so am i right there (do you think i would need to prove the sequence of terms converges to 1 or can i just state it doesnt converge to 0 by intuition?)

as for the 2nd one... ok i am using the comparison test, and the property of absolute convergence... yes this is one of the properties we are told. i think i get that one now but how do you know the example you gave is always greater (or equal) to the series in question?

my main problem is knowing what needs to be shown and what can just be stated... :S

see my intuition was correct

but i dont always know how to show it

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Prove It** A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a series to converge is that the individual terms have to tend to 0.

Why is that not sufficient?

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**alexmahone** Why is that not sufficient?

What about the harmonic series? The terms tend to 0 but the series does NOT converge.

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** how do you know the example you gave is always greater (or equal) to the series in question?

Because each term can never be any greater than its absolute value...

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**alexmahone** Why is that not sufficient?

its not sufficient because it doesnt hold for vice versa. they can converge to 0 without the series converging.

Prove It - i mean the 1/5^r being greater than the sin one?

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** i mean the 1/5^r being greater than the sin one?

That is a simple geometric series with ratio less that 1.

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Shizaru** its not sufficient because it doesnt hold for vice versa. they can converge to 0 without the series converging.

Prove It - i mean the 1/5^r being greater than the sin one?

You should know that for all .

Therefore

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Prove It** You should know that

for all

.

of course i know this and i am an idiot for not seeing this was neccessary. thanks for the pointer

but wait doesnt imply anyway so why do i have to bother with using absolute convergence properties in the first place? can't i just directly use the comparison with the |1/5^r|?

also we would need to show that 1/5^r converges, but how?

(can someone just confirm my suspicion here also - that it is sinr^2 and not just sin r, actually makes no difference here? is this just an attempt to deceive?)

Re: Converge or diverge plus show why

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Plato** That is a simple geometric series with ratio less that 1.

how is it? it's not (1/5)^r. If it was I could see that