Hello,
One defines.
is defined on the maximal subregion
.
Now letand
.
How to prove, that the following implication is not true in general:
In a book about functional analysis I read the following lemma:
"Let. If the inequality
holds for all
and for all
then
is weakly differentiable in
with
."
Here the problem is, so the lemma can not be used.
Do you have a counter example?
Kind regards,
Alexander


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks