If I want to know wither =0 can i say that if for some value of

we have that

then it is not the case that

=0 as

Im struggling to come up with a counter example or anything for this.

thanks for any help

Results 1 to 2 of 2

- October 22nd 2011, 01:36 PM #1

- Joined
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 288

- October 23rd 2011, 10:35 PM #2
## Re: Lim Sup question

The question is not very clear. However, there is one problem in the third line: is exactly , because you're chosing as one function from the sequence . This doesn't make sense. On the other hand, If you can find a sub-sequence of functions with limit greater than zero, then you know that your is not zero. If that's what you mean by then your statement is correct.