As in title I'm trying to write the Laurent series offor
, but I'm stuck...
![]()
Ok, another last thing, the exercise was at the beginning: Laurent series offor
,
then I wrote partial fractions:and then I wrote the Laurent Series for every fraction:
At this point my question is: I can leaveand
as they are?
So the final result will be:
![]()
If it is allowed to consider a Taylor expansion a particular case of Laurent expansion where all the negative coefficients are 0, then the expansion ofaround
...
(1)
... is a Laurent expansion. The (1) converges forbut with a procedure called 'analytic extension' the analyticity of
can be 'extended' to the region
. Of course a spontaneous question is: what's the practical utility of all that?...
Kind regards
![]()
![]()
The final answer is correct, but it looks a bit clumsy because of the two separate summations, which could easily be combined into one. In fact, it would have been better to write the partial fraction expression using only one term with denominator
That way, you get a constant term 1 for the Laurent series, plus a single series arising from the z-1 denominator.

