Re: Lebesgue measure on RxR
(i) You computed the measure of the triangle whose vertexes are
,
,
, but it's not what it's asked. You can write
and show that for all
,
. To do that, you can cover the line for a fixed
by
squares with measure
.
(ii) Write
where
. We can compute the measure of the complement of
in
writing
.
Re: Lebesgue measure on RxR
(i) Oh, I see. And then one lets
and we obtain
and since the original set is a disjoint union of sets of measure zero we get at it is also of measure zero.
(ii) Here I fully understand what you mean but I'm not sure of my result.
So what I get is
. And then
. So
.
Is this correct? What I'm not sure about is the step
, from what I've read the set needs to be a "rectangle" for that to be allowed.
Re: Lebesgue measure on RxR
(i) It's ok.
(ii) We can write, since the measures of the following sets are finite:
, and conclude since
is countable.