Results 1 to 5 of 5

Math Help - subsequence help.

  1. #1
    Member
    Joined
    May 2011
    Posts
    169

    subsequence help.

    Let {sn} be a sequence and let E be the set containing members x such that x is a limit of a subsequence of sn. Let S*=sup(E).
    Prove S* is a member of E.

    I do not understand the first part of the proof (from a textbook). It goes if S* = infinity then E is unbounded (fine so far). Then {sn} is unbounded, hence there is a subsequence -> infinity.

    This raised a few questions.

    If {sn} is unbounded, does sn -> + or - infinity?
    The proof also seems to imply {sn} -> infinity iff xn -> infinity, where xn is a subsequence. Correct?

    Thanks
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Super Member girdav's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    From
    Rouen, France
    Posts
    678
    Thanks
    32

    Re: subsequence help.

    I guess \{s_n\} is a sequence of real numbers. Well, if \{s_n\} is unbounded, then the sequence is either unbounded below or unbounded above. In the first case, we can find a subsequence which converges to -\infty, and in the second case we can find a subsequence which converges to +\infty. Here, since \sup E=+\infty in the first part, then \{s_n\} is not bounded above.
    If we have \lim_n x_n=+\infty for a subsequence \{x_n\} of \{s_n\}, it doesn't mean that \lim_n s_n=+\infty. For example, take s_n=(-1)^nn (the limit doesn't exist).
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Member
    Joined
    May 2011
    Posts
    169

    Re: subsequence help.

    So you are saying {sn} is unbounded iff it has a subsequence which is unbounded?

    If so, since sn is unbounded it tends to infinity, hence it has a subsequence tending to infinity. Correct?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18,959
    Thanks
    1783
    Awards
    1

    Re: subsequence help.

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    Let {sn} be a sequence and let E be the set containing members x such that x is a limit of a subsequence of sn. Let S*=sup(E). Prove S* is a member of E.
    The proof (from a textbook). It goes if S* = infinity then E is unbounded (fine so far). Then {sn} is unbounded, hence there is a subsequence -> infinity.
    In these cases it is best to say what textbook you are using.
    Not knowing where that proof is going makes it really hard to comment.

    Here is the way I know the proof works.
    Suppose that S^* = \sup (E) and that S^* < \infty \;\& \,S^* \notin E.

    Construct a sequence x_1<x_2<\cdots<S^* so that each x_n\in E~\&~\left| {x_n  - S^*} \right| < \frac{1}{n}
    A bounded montone sequence has a limit: (x_n)\to y.
    It is easy to see y\in E.~\&~y<S^*. But that is a contradiction.
    Thus  S^* = \infty \;\text{ or } \,S^* \in E
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Member
    Joined
    May 2011
    Posts
    169

    Re: subsequence help.

    I'm using Rudin's analysis. I was just struggling to see how he goes from (1) if S* = infinity then E is unbounded to (2) Then {sn} is unbounded, and then finally (3) hence there is a subsequence -> infinity. Can you tell me the results he is using to get from (1) to (2) and then (2) to (3) ? Thanks for your alternative proof as well.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Subsequence
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 5th 2010, 06:17 AM
  2. subsequence
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 15th 2009, 12:17 PM
  3. subsequence
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: July 7th 2008, 09:45 AM
  4. Subsequence
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 24th 2006, 10:43 AM
  5. Subsequence
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 23rd 2006, 06:11 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum