Quick Cluster Points Question
I'm beginning to study Analysis but I'm having the wording of this particular paragraph is confusing to me:
"The definition of boundary point (when this is not an isolated point) implies that any ball about such a point actually contains infinitely many points from S. Thus, a cluster point can be either a boundary point or an interior point of a set S but never an exterior point of S. If, for instance S is the set of rational numbers contained in the unit interval,
, then no point in S is an interior point of S and
"
It's the last sentence that loses me. Are they saying that no point in S is an interior point of S and an interior point of
. Or are they saying that no point in S is an interior point of S... AND...
?
Re: Quick Cluster Points Question
I'm getting LaTeX errors on most of what I put in there... can others see it? I don't know what the deal is.
Re: Quick Cluster Points Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jameselmore91
I'm getting LaTeX errors on most of what I put in there... can others see it? I don't know what the deal is.
Use [TEX]...[/TEX] not [Math]...[/Math]
Re: Quick Cluster Points Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jameselmore91
. If, for instance S is the set of rational numbers contained in the unit interval,
![S = Q \cap [0, 1]](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?S = Q \cap [0, 1])
, then no point in S is an interior point of S and
![\overline{S} = [0, 1]](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\overline{S} = [0, 1])
"
It's the last sentence that loses me. Are they saying that no point in S is an interior point of S and an interior point of

Any open set that contains a point of
also contains an irrational number. Therefore every point of
is a boundary point if
and not an interior point.
Re: Quick Cluster Points Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jameselmore91
I'm beginning to study Analysis but I'm having the wording of this particular paragraph is confusing to me:
"The definition of boundary point (when this is not an isolated point) implies that any ball about such a point actually contains infinitely many points from S. Thus, a cluster point can be either a boundary point or an interior point of a set S but never an exterior point of S. If, for instance S is the set of rational numbers contained in the unit interval,
![S = Q \bigcap [0, 1]](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?S = Q \bigcap [0, 1])
, then no point in S is an interior point of S and
![\overline{S} = [0, 1]](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\overline{S} = [0, 1])
"
It's the last sentence that loses me. Are they saying that no point in S is an interior point of S and an interior point of

. Or are they saying that no point in S is an interior point of S... AND...
![\overline{S} = [0, 1]](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\overline{S} = [0, 1])
?
It is the second.