Prove or disprove:
If http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_ny_n) is a null sequence then one or both of http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_n), \, (y_n) is(are) null.
My attempt:
if http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?..., and \, (y_n) both are null then certainly http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_ny_n) is null, no problem with that.
I assumed that http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_n) is not null, http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(y_n) is not null and as given, http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_ny_n) is null. I tried to bring a contradiction since i have a feeling that the statement in the question is true.
since its assumed that http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_n) is not null so:
there exists http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\epsilon_1>0 such that for all http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?N there exists http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?n \geq N such that http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?|x_n|>\epsilon_1
similarly:
there exists http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\epsilon_2>0 such that for all http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?N there exists http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?n \geq N such that http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?|y_n|>\epsilon_2
and since http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(x_ny_n) is null:
there exists http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?N such that http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?...n_1 \epsilon_2
now since i can't say that http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?..._n|>\epsilon_2 occur at the same http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?n i can't find a contradiction.
someone help.

