Hi guys,
I have two questions wanting to clarify.
1) My lecture notes say that if a set is open then its complement is closed. However some books also say that the converse is true: that is if a set is closed, then its complement is open. Is this correct?
2) Is a boundary point a limit point? The definition says that a boundary point x which belongs to S is a point if, for all epsilon > 0, the neighborhood of x contains both S and the complement of S. Doesn't this make x a limit point also? Since you can approach x from elements in the set S.
Thanks for reading.
Indeed, in most texts, a "closed" set is defined as "the complement of an open set" and then it is proved that the complement of a closed set is an open set.
The definition of "boundary point" is, as you say, that every neighborhood contains points of S and of the complement of S. The definition of "limit point" is that every neighborhood contains points of S other than X itelf. Plato's example gives a point, 0, such that every neighborhood of 0 contains only 0 from the set. It is a boundary point but not a limit point. Such points are called "isolated points" of S.2) Is a boundary point a limit point? The definition says that a boundary point x which belongs to S is a point if, for all epsilon > 0, the neighborhood of x contains both S and the complement of S. Doesn't this make x a limit point also? Since you can approach x from elements in the set S.
Thanks for reading.