I find subsets, as presented in "foundations of analysis" type books, confusing. They start off with a definition of subset as "if x in A then x in B."
Later the discussion moves to subsets of a Euclidean space and open subsets. Is a surface S in R3 a subset of R3? What is the neighborhood of a subset of S? What is the interior of a subset of S? If the neighborhood is defined in R3, there is no such thing as an open surface as a subset in Euclidean space.
What implications does this have for a mapping from R3 to a subset of R3 if the subset is a surface?
In researching the question, I came up with the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A topological space is a set X together with a collection T of subsets of X satisfying the following axioms:
The set T is a topology on X. The sets in T are the open sets, and their complements in X are the closed sets. The elements of X are called points.
- The empty set and X are in T.
- The union of any collection of sets in T is also in T.
- The intersection of any pair of sets in T is also in T.
A function between topological spaces is said to be continuous if the inverse image of every open set is open.
- More generally, the Euclidean spaces Rn are topological spaces, and the open sets are generated by open balls.
- Any metric space turns into a topological space if one defines the open sets to be generated by the set of all open balls.
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Topological_space
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
which is a marvel of clarity. The only question remaining is, can you talk about continuity for a function which maps a "3-dimensional" subset of R3, say a solid sphere, into a line or surface in R3?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks