Hello,
This is a question from Baby Rudin, Exercise 4.4 I was wondering if anyone could verify my reasoning:
The question is, ifis a continuous function from a metric space
to a metrix space
, and a set
is dense in X, then show
in dense in
.
So I have the solution:
Sinceis dense in
, then for any
, we can construct a sequence of points
where the
and
.
Since f is continuous, we know, and since
and
,
is dense in
.
-----
So my qualms with that solution are
a) The first statment,
Sinceis dense in
, then for any
, we can construct a sequence of points
where the
and
.
Is that a true statement for all dense subsetsof a metric space
?? it seems like a serious claim to make, I have never heard or seen a theorem that says anything like that and I can't find anything in Rudin.
b) The last statement,
Sinceand
,
is dense in
.
How doesconverging to
show us that
is dense in
? Is it because
is arbitrary? is the theorem (which I don't know about) an if and only if theorem?
--
Essentially I am asking if there is a theorem (which I can't seem to find anywhere) which states:
is dense in
, if and only if for any
, we can construct a sequence of points
where the
and
.
Thanks, any help appreciated!!


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



