If then it should be easy enough to show that . Can you see a way to do that?
It is true enough that what I said was unhelpful, but I'm afraid I don't understand your rebuttle. You appear to have contradicted the converse of AKTilted's statement. However I hoped to show that
the contrapositive being:
and therefore that is disjoint. A proper quashing of that reasoning would be letting and . Woops!