Results 1 to 5 of 5

Math Help - A Baby Rudin Related Question

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    24

    A Baby Rudin Related Question

    See the attachment for my question.

    I am confused on how to do this problem... I need a little bit of help getting started.

    (a), (b), and (c) seem trivial. I can't think of doing anything other than actually going through this process a couple of times to show these are all true by induction. I however have no idea nor understand part (d). Parts (e) and (f) I think I can manage pretty easily after getting the others done. Do you guys think induction is appropriate for the first 3? and could someone help shed some light on part (d).

    This whole problem seems pretty weird to me. I dont even see how you could pick a pair of to start with..
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails A Baby Rudin Related Question-homework_4q1.jpg  
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Banned
    Joined
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,261
    Thanks
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by DontKnoMaff View Post
    See the attachment for my question.

    I am confused on how to do this problem... I need a little bit of help getting started.

    (a), (b), and (c) seem trivial. I can't think of doing anything other than actually going through this process a couple of times to show these are all true by induction. I however have no idea nor understand part (d). Parts (e) and (f) I think I can manage pretty easily after getting the others done. Do you guys think induction is appropriate for the first 3? and could someone help shed some light on part (d).

    This whole problem seems pretty weird to me. I dont even see how you could pick a pair of to start with..

    This is not more and not less that a particular case of the great Cantor's Theorem for closed embedded intervals (in the real line with the usual euclidean topology), and its usual, and perhaps easier, proof uses another great theorem: Bolzano-Weierstrass's: every bounded infinite sequence has a partial limit <==> every bounded infinite sequence has a subsequence which converges to a limit.
    I'm not aware of any use of induction to prove this.

    As for part (d) it follows directly from the work above: x belongs to all and each of of the closed intervals, so if x^m\neq y then either x^m<y or x^m>y , say y-x^m=\epsilon>0 , but then we get a contradiction by considering that a_n\xrightarrow [n\to \infty]{}x and thus some a_n will be between x^m\,\,and\,\,y ....and something very similar for x^m>y

    Tonio
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Joined
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    24

    re:

    I am sorry, were you referring to part (c) or (f) in that response?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Banned
    Joined
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,261
    Thanks
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by DontKnoMaff View Post
    I am sorry, were you referring to part (c) or (f) in that response?

    (f) relying on (c), of course...ain't this clear from the context?

    Tonio
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Joined
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    24
    A Baby Rudin Related Question-img00094-20100919-1930.jpg
    A Baby Rudin Related Question-img00093-20100919-1924.jpg
    I only asked because I was hoing for some help on (d) specifically, in any case, I would like to post my work on this and see if anybody has a problem with it. I am very unsure on how to do this...
    part (a)-(d) see my attachment

    (e) I would like to just use the Bolzano Weierstrass Theorem here.... This is as far as I have done..
    Last edited by DontKnoMaff; September 23rd 2010 at 04:35 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Variation on Baby Rudin question - Differentiability
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 16th 2011, 02:52 PM
  2. Theorem from Baby Rudin (Thm. 2.36)
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 13th 2011, 09:45 PM
  3. Baby Rudin problem 1.5
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 29th 2010, 07:11 AM
  4. Baby Rudin - ch 2, ex 27
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 21st 2010, 01:24 PM
  5. Analysis question from Baby Rudin (PMA), Chapter 1
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 14th 2010, 01:14 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum