This was a step glossed over in a proof in the convergence of
^n)
that I can't seem to understand where certain terms are appearing from.
The identity is
I was able to get something similar by dividing

s on the left hand side acros the 0th term
)
to the
)
st term but that still leaves the

th and
)
st term untouched and with a final term not in the form of the right hand side. It also leaves
(n-k+1))
in the left hand product.
Just to illustrate what I mean I will take the case of
This is wrong: if
then
, and you reached up to 5...!
Tonio
Something tells me I'm making a wrong assumption somewhere or it's something dumb and obvious but I can't seem to get how this will end up in the form on the lhs.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.