Results 1 to 4 of 4

Math Help - Banach spaces

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    14

    Banach spaces

    Hi,

    The question: Let X, Y be Banach spaces, T:X\to Y be a linear map. Prove that if L\circ T is a continuous linear functional X\to \mathbb{R} for every continuous linear functional L: Y\to \mathbb{R}, then T is continuous.

    The hypothesis of the problem (that X and Y both be Banach) suggest to me the Open Mapping Theorem, but we don't have T mapping onto Y, and T(X) may not be closed (which we need for it to be complete as a subspace of the complete space Y).

    As always your help is much appreciated.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Member
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    113
    L\circ T(B) is bounded in \mathbb{R} for each L\in Y^*. Hence Banach Steinhauss implies T(B) is bounded in Y.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    14
    Thanks for your response. I take it that B is the closed unit ball (to have completeness). However, the Banach Steinhaus theorem requires that, for each point, a family of operators all be bounded by some number. Although L\circ T is bounded by some M_L>0 for each L, the supremum of all such M_L may be infinite!

    Are there any other suggestions?

    Thanks again.

    EDIT: Nevermind: it turns out to be a straightforward application of the CGT.
    Last edited by james123; March 28th 2010 at 02:19 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Member
    Joined
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    113
    Quote Originally Posted by james123 View Post
    Thanks for your response. I take it that B is the closed unit ball (to have completeness). However, the Banach Steinhaus theorem requires that, for each point, a family of operators all be bounded by some number. Although L\circ T is bounded by some M_L>0 for each L, the supremum of all such M_L may be infinite!

    Are there any other suggestions?

    Thanks again.
    You are right, the result is true even with no completeness. Being weakly bounded is equivalent to be norm bounded, it is a fundamental result in Functional Analysis, valid for locally convex spaces even non barrelled (spaces satisfying Banach Steinhauss). Your hypothesis clearly implies that T(B) is weakly bounded.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Banach spaces or not?
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 1st 2011, 02:41 PM
  2. Banach spaces help
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 30th 2010, 03:11 AM
  3. Banach-spaces
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 24th 2010, 02:45 PM
  4. Banach spaces
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: February 24th 2010, 12:27 AM
  5. Annihilators in Banach Spaces
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 26th 2009, 06:23 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum