i have a question about uniform convergence. definition of uniform convergence is given, there exists
such that for all
and for all
, we have
. i was wondering why the pointwise convergence does not imply uniform convergence. i know that for pointwise convergence, depending on
, you have to find a different
to have
. but for each
,
will eventually be within the distance of
for
for some natural number
so if you choose max of such
and call it
, then can we say for given
, for all x and for all
![]()
?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks