Supposein measure, and
in measure, prove that (a)
in measure and that (b)
in measure if
, not if
Proof so far.
(a) I think this is pretty easy.
I know that, we have
and
.
Now, since![]()
Question 1: Is this really right? I took this from a proof in the book, but I'm failing to fully understand why it is true.
So it follows that![]()
Therefore proved (a). Is this right?
For (b), I know that I need to show that:
But umm... a bit stuck here, how should I incorporate the fact that?
Thank you!


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

