Ifalmost uniformly, then
a.e. and
in measure.
Proof so far.
Now, sincealmost uniformly, I know that for any
, there exists
such that
and
uniformly on
, that is,
.
First, I want to show thata.e.
Let
Claim:
Suppose to the contrary that, then there exists
such that
and that
uniformly on
, and
But since fn do not converge to f on A , that is a contradication.
My question is: Why can I choose a B in A in that fashion and to get fn converges uniformly to A for all x in?
Thank you.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

