http://i34.tinypic.com/wu5k414.png
I don't understand how to prove this considering f(x) is not specifically given....(Wondering)
Printable View
http://i34.tinypic.com/wu5k414.png
I don't understand how to prove this considering f(x) is not specifically given....(Wondering)
Remember that for a function to be diff. atthere exists a linear transformation
such that
as
. Take
then
and since
we have that this goes to
as
goes to
. This proves that
is diff. at
and
. When
we can only bound by
, but I can't think of a counter-example at the moment for this case.
A good counterexample iswith
.
Oh, in that case how about?