Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Proof of Lemma on Polynomials

  1. #1
    Sep 2009

    Proof of Lemma on Polynomials

    There is a Lemma in my textbook that states,

    If P(h) is a polynomial of degree <= k, that vanishes to order > k as h -> 0 [i.e. P(h)/|h|^k -> 0], then P === 0 (=== is a triple equals sign)


    I don't quite understand what P===0 means. I know that the === represents congruence used in modular arithmetic. However, how is this applicable here?

    Also, I don't understand how P(h)/|h|^k -> 0 implies that polynomial of degree <= k vanishes to order > k. From this statement, it seems like P vanishes to order equal to k.

    Basically, what does this Lemma even mean?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Super Member
    Apr 2009
    If P \in F[x] (where F= \mathbb{R} or \mathbb{C} ) P(x)= \sum_{j=0} ^{k} \ a_jx^j and \frac{P(x)}{x^k} = \sum_{j=0} ^{k} \ a_jx^{j-k} and so for every i<k the term x^{i-k} \rightarrow \infty as x \rightarrow 0 (assuming a_i \neq 0) and so for all i<k a_i=0, and so 0= \frac{P(x)}{x^k} = a_k and so  P \equiv 0 (this means P is identically zero). Now try induction on the number of variables.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Euclid's Lemma Proof by Induction
    Posted in the Number Theory Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Feb 7th 2011, 02:25 AM
  2. Proof of Pratt's Lemma
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 16th 2010, 01:04 PM
  3. Lemma proof help?
    Posted in the Geometry Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar 20th 2010, 04:08 PM
  4. Pumping Lemma proof...
    Posted in the Discrete Math Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Mar 15th 2010, 08:50 AM
  5. Proof of a lemma
    Posted in the Pre-Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Apr 29th 2009, 06:19 AM

Search Tags

/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum