1. ## Linear Operators

Find the non-zero e-values and corresponding e-functions of a linear integral operator A with kernel
$\displaystyle K(x,y)=(x^2+\frac{1}{x})y, 1 \leq x,y \leq 2$.This operator acts on the space of continuous functions
$\displaystyle L={f(x),0 \leq x \leq 1}$ in the usual way;
(Af)(x)=(int0..1)K(x,y)f(y)dy.

No one knows how to do it even at the tutorials, and the lecturer don't wanna know lol. Help please

2. Originally Posted by Elite
Find the non-zero e-values and corresponding e-functions of a linear integral operator A with kernel
$\displaystyle K(x,y)=(x^2+\frac{1}{x})y, 1 \leq x,y \leq 2$.This operator acts on the space of continuous functions
$\displaystyle L={f(x),0 \leq x \leq 1}$ in the usual way;
(Af)(x)=(int0..1)K(x,y)f(y)dy.

No one knows how to do it even at the tutorials, and the lecturer don't wanna know lol. Help please
If the kernel is defined for x and y lying between 1 and 2, then the integral must go from 1 to 2 (not from 0 to 1), and the function space L must also consist of functions defined on [1,2], not [0.1].

If $\displaystyle \lambda$ is an eigenvalue then $\displaystyle Af(x) = \lambda f(x)$, so $\displaystyle \int_1^2(x^2+x^{-1})yf(y)\,dy = \lambda f(x)$. But as far as the integral is concerned, x is a constant, so we can take out the factor $\displaystyle (x^2+x^{-1})$ and get $\displaystyle (x^2+x^{-1})\int_1^2yf(y)\,dy = \lambda f(x)$. But then the integral is a constant, and we are left with two possibilities. The first is that $\displaystyle \lambda$ and the integral are both 0. The second is that f(x) is a nonzero constant times $\displaystyle x^2+x^{-1}$, in which case you can plug that formula for f into the integral, and you should then find that $\displaystyle \lambda = 19/4$ (if I've done the integration correctly).

3. Yep i agree, either there was a mistake in the actual question about the limits or you made a typo while copying.

This question is actually much simpler than the similar types of questions your probably able to do.

the problem here was the 1/x im guessing. but noticing that the function is seperable
you can do it in no time.