Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Problem finding explicit formulation of series coefficient

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jul 2015
    From
    Montréal
    Posts
    2

    Problem finding explicit formulation of series coefficient

    Hi,

    I am currently working on gas diffusion through membranes and I am having issues finding a coefficient for the ODE's solution, based on the method presented here.

    My problem concerns the coefficient lambda, appearing after developping Fick's law, given by eq.16 :

    tan(λn) = (k*SR − δRλnn + SRβn)) / (SRδRλn + βn(k*SR − δRλn2)

    where k = 1,
    SR remains a symbolic variable,
    δR is a known constant,
    βn is a function of λnR,SR and k

    To perform a curve fit with my experimental data, I need to find an explicit formulation of λn. In practice, I can consider only the first term of the summation (λ1) for sufficient accuracy.

    How can I express explicitly λ1? The tan() function is giving me a headache

    Thank you,


    edit : I would like to do something similar to the transformation in eqs 11-12 in this paper
    Last edited by epar1628; Jul 16th 2015 at 11:50 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2013
    From
    California
    Posts
    6,588
    Thanks
    2916

    Re: Problem finding explicit formulation of series coefficient

    If $\beta_1$ is an unspecified function of $\lambda_1$ I don't see how you have any hope of even approximately solving for $\lambda_1$

    Do you have bounds on $\lambda_1$ ?

    On $\left(-\dfrac {\pi}{4}, \dfrac {\pi}{4}\right), \tan(x) \approx x$
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jul 2015
    From
    Montréal
    Posts
    2

    Re: Problem finding explicit formulation of series coefficient

    Hi,

    β is a known function, sorry for the misunderstanding.

    β = (δR * λn2 - k SR) / (SR * λn * δR)

    Could you give me hints on the method applied in the second paper (Aachib et al.) to transform the alpha parameter from eq. 11 to eq. 12? It would work for my purposes, but I don't see what the intermediate steps are ...

    Thank you,
    Last edited by epar1628; Jul 20th 2015 at 11:25 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Jan 22nd 2013, 08:37 PM
  2. Problem Solving/Logic Problem
    Posted in the Discrete Math Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep 6th 2012, 06:09 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jul 19th 2012, 01:42 AM
  4. tried to use problem solving process for my problem
    Posted in the Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Jun 14th 2012, 02:56 PM
  5. Problem Solving
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug 5th 2010, 07:45 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum