Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree1Thanks
  • 1 Post By topsquark

Math Help - Prove that this is a function of time

  1. #1
    Member
    Joined
    May 2008
    From
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    28

    Prove that this is a function of time

    As part of a larger problem I need to prove that the following equation is a function of time. I guess that means I must get rid of the partial derivatives and replace them with total derivatives?


     ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i

    I have the following relationships from electromagnetism:

     \underline B = \nabla \times \underline A and \underline E = - \frac{\partial \underline A}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i}

    I have been battling this for over a week!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Forum Admin topsquark's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    From
    Wellsville, NY
    Posts
    9,962
    Thanks
    349
    Awards
    1

    Re: Prove that this is a function of time

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi_Dave View Post
    As part of a larger problem I need to prove that the following equation is a function of time. I guess that means I must get rid of the partial derivatives and replace them with total derivatives?


     ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i

    I have the following relationships from electromagnetism:

     \underline B = \nabla \times \underline A and \underline E = - \frac{\partial \underline A}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i}

    I have been battling this for over a week!
    Possible sources of time dependence:
    1. It's not typical but V could be time dependent

    2. A could be time dependent

    3. \dot{x} could be time dependent

    Without knowing the rest of the problem I can't say anything more about it.

    -Dan
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Member
    Joined
    May 2008
    From
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    28

    Re: Prove that this is a function of time

    Here is the whole problem:

    Calculus of Variations Rund Trautman Electromagnetism Problem

    A,V,x and x dot are all functions of time.

    I think I need to show that a function F exists such that

    \dot F(t)= ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i + q A_i \dot x_i +2tq(\dot x_i \frac{\partial A_i}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial V}{\partial t})-2qV

    Now terms 2 and 4 are clearly only functions of t.

    I can manipulate term 3 to get:
    - \underline E \cdot \underline {\dot x} - \frac{dV}{dt}

    Now term 1 is my problem

    \dot F_1(t)= ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i

    And if I'm not mistaken I do that by getting rid of the partial derivaties?

    Using the equation for E I get:

    ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i=q( \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j + \underline E + \frac{\partial A_i}{\partial t} )x_i

    Now the RHS of this looks remarkibly (but not quite) like the total derivative of A. The next equation is not correct (I don't think) but it is the sort of thing I need to get to?

    q \frac{d \underline A}{dt} \cdot \underline r + q \underline E \cdot \underline r
    Last edited by Kiwi_Dave; April 14th 2013 at 05:42 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Forum Admin topsquark's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    From
    Wellsville, NY
    Posts
    9,962
    Thanks
    349
    Awards
    1

    Re: Prove that this is a function of time

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi_Dave View Post
    Here is the whole problem:

    Calculus of Variations Rund Trautman Electromagnetism Problem

    A,V,x and x dot are all functions of time.

    I think I need to show that a function F exists such that

    \dot F(t)= ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i + q A_i \dot x_i +2tq(\dot x_i \frac{\partial A_i}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial V}{\partial t})-2qV

    Now terms 2 and 4 are clearly only functions of t.

    I can manipulate term 3 to get:
    - \underline E \cdot \underline {\dot x} - \frac{dV}{dt}

    Now term 1 is my problem

    \dot F_1(t)= ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i

    And if I'm not mistaken I do that by getting rid of the partial derivaties?

    Using the equation for E I get:

    ( q \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j-q \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_i} )x_i=q( \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}\dot x_j + \underline E + \frac{\partial A_i}{\partial t} )x_i

    Now the RHS of this looks remarkibly (but not quite) like the total derivative of A. The next equation is not correct (I don't think) but it is the sort of thing I need to get to?

    q \frac{d \underline A}{dt} \cdot \underline r + q \underline E \cdot \underline r
    It looks like it ought to be a simple substitution problem. Just for clarity, what is \zeta? (It might not matter since all you are looking for is to prove that F is the same in the primed and un-primed coordinates, but I haven't worked the problem yet.)

    -Dan
    Thanks from Kiwi_Dave
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Member
    Joined
    May 2008
    From
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    28

    Re: Prove that this is a function of time

    Zeta and Tau come from

    t'=t(1+\epsilon) and x^{\mu'}=x^{\mu}(1+\frac12 \epsilon)

    giving

    \zeta ^{\mu}=\frac {x^{\mu}}{2} and \tau = t

    They come from

    t'=T(t,q^{\mu},\epsilon)

    \tau = (dT/d \epsilon)_{\epsilon = 0} and a similar equation for zeta.


    This problem comes from Example 4, here: Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem: Dwight E. Neuenschwander: 9780801896941: Amazon.com: Books
    Last edited by Kiwi_Dave; April 14th 2013 at 09:45 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 14th 2010, 08:57 PM
  2. Velocity as a function of time
    Posted in the Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 22nd 2009, 04:53 PM
  3. Function of time
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 7th 2009, 07:41 PM
  4. Function of height and time?
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 29th 2009, 01:27 PM
  5. distance as a function of time
    Posted in the Advanced Applied Math Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 22nd 2008, 11:59 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum