Being an anti-derivative of then, .
I don't agree with the method proposed by FernandoRevilla because F(x) is defined relatively to V(x) which is not known. i.e. the solution is expressed as a function of the solution itself. So, the differential equation is transformed into an integral equation. That way, the problem remains unsolved.
... is solved via the identity...
... so that the (1) becomes...
... where the variables are separated, so that we easily obtain...
... where is a primitive of . The result (4) is in most cases 'easy' to obtain. In You want to find y , then from (4) You obtain...
... even if the integral in (5) in most cases is hard to solve...
Thanks JJ for your help! I have two quesrions though.
1st. I know line two of your attachment is true, but how did you go about coming up with it from the equation in line 1?
2nd. In order to solve an equation of this sort, what level of math maturity is required? I havent taken any upper divission courses in math yet, but I will next semester. Is this something I was supposed to have solved knowing enough about ODE's?
This equation, by the way, came up in a (unusually challenging (!)) problem from Electrodynamics where the N is made up of a complicated expression involving many constants.