I am stuck on how to solve the following, i don't weather my arithmetic is wrong or what i am doing. So could someone please do each step.

Find the particular solution to

a) dh/dt=2h(3-h) where y=1 and t=0

b) dy/dx= e^y +1/e^y where y=0 when x=0.

Printable View

- August 15th 2011, 10:54 PMjohnsy123Finding particular solution from differential equations
I am stuck on how to solve the following, i don't weather my arithmetic is wrong or what i am doing. So could someone please do each step.

Find the particular solution to

a) dh/dt=2h(3-h) where y=1 and t=0

b) dy/dx= e^y +1/e^y where y=0 when x=0. - August 16th 2011, 12:27 AMSironRe: Finding particular solution from differential equations
First of all try to find the general solution of the DE (it's a separable one), for example the first one:

Calculating general solution, first rewrite the DE:

Take the integral of both sides:

If you split the integrand in partial fractions (in LHS) you'll get:

Now try to continue and try to get an expression and afterwards substitute to find .

(Note: is the natural logarithm) - August 16th 2011, 01:49 AMProve ItRe: Finding particular solution from differential equations
- August 16th 2011, 02:51 AMjohnsy123Re: Finding particular solution from differential equations
It is (e^y +1)/(e^y)

- August 16th 2011, 02:54 AMProve ItRe: Finding particular solution from differential equations
- August 16th 2011, 04:35 AMchisigmaBe carefully using the results of Wolfram!...
... so that the DE is...

(1)

In (1) the variables are separable and the solution is found with the standard approach...

(2)

... and the 'initial condition' means that is . All right?... yes, of course, but it is interesting to spend a little of time about the details of the integration performed in (2). The integral is...

(3)

The integral (3) is not 'trascendental' but may be that someone prefers to use Wolfram because 'it saves time'... well!... please observe the result supplied by Wolfram (Thinking)...

Wolfram Mathematica Online Integrator

Kind regards

- August 16th 2011, 04:52 AMProve ItRe: Be carefully using the results of Wolfram!...
Just so everyone knows, in Australia Separation of Variables isn't taught until university. The OP's question is from Year 12 Specialist Mathematics, so the method I gave is the method that is expected.

- August 16th 2011, 05:35 AMchisigmaRe: Be carefully using the results of Wolfram!...
Of course different methods can give the same result... in this case the 'Year 12 Specialist Mathematics method' gives the solution...

(1)

... and the 'chisigma method' gives the solution...

(2)

... but considering the 'identity'...

(3)

... it is obvious that (1) and (2) are exactly the same expression. Scope [a little polemical may be...] of my post was to do some considerations about the 'reliability' of some 'very popular tools' (Thinking)...

Kind regards