Now sub to find
After you know that, the rest falls out as follows
Hi Guys
been about 20years since i flexed my maths muscle and it apears to have weakened somewhat.
Im reading a research paper and going through the equations therein and have come across a part I cant solve.
I dont want to just use the papers equations without understanding how they were derived (not my style) so any help with this bottleneck would be really appreciated
Heres what the paper gives:
V = wA/2Nr
where V is a radial velocity hence can be rewrited as = -dr/dt (where r is radial position and t is time)
so we have -dr/dt =wA/2Nr (1)
We need to solve for r.
the paper gives the initial condition, r=ro at t=0 (where ro is a constant)
It then gives a solution for r as:- r= (ro^2- (wAt/N)^0.5
I cant see how they get that.....
can anyone shed any light on this?
I assumed I just needed to substitute ro into eq (1) and integrate with respect to t
giving r = wAt/2Nro?
but thats not what the paper is showing.
I can only assume im missing something/forgotten something. any help would be appreciated