Hi folks,
What does one do when the particular solution is defined implicitly and it has to be differentiated an put back into original DE to check it?
See attached pdf...thanks!
Printable View
Hi folks,
What does one do when the particular solution is defined implicitly and it has to be differentiated an put back into original DE to check it?
See attached pdf...thanks!
You're missing a 2 in your answer. As for showing it satisfies the PDE you can either (1) try and solve forexplicitly, then sub into the PDE or (2) differentiate your solution implicitly and solve for
and
and sub into your PDE.
I managed to get u(x,y) explicitly and got u_x and u_y.
In terms of your method (1), you say solve for u explicitly and then sub into PDE, but we have to get u_x and u_y beore we sub in right?
For your (2), this looks interesting but wouldnt it be difficult to get u_x and u_y if its implicitly defined? otherwise (1) is the exact same (2)?
Thanks
Difficult - not really. From your solution
![]()
then
and solving forgives
Similarly
.
Substituting into your PDE and simplifying shows it's identically satisfied!