So I'm reading through Ordinary Differential Equations by Tenenbaum and Pollard, page 76, Example 9.5, and I find it bizarre. It says thatis exact on
which I readily believe. It then says we can integrate each part from
to
, i.e.
. The second integrand baffles me. The book hints that, because we're taking the integral with respect to
at the point
with
fixed, we can therefore eliminate the
. But one: Why? Two: If that's so, can't we do the same with the other one and have it be
?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks