Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Really Struggling :(

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Aug 2010
    From
    Queenstown
    Posts
    16

    Unhappy Really Struggling :(

    Hi,
    I am really struggling with a subject at my university which is all about partial differential equations. It takes me a long time to understand even the most basic concepts, and I really need some help understanding and completing the following questions.

    Let $\displaystyle \mathcal{R}$ be a bounded region in $\displaystyle \mathbb{R}^3$, and suppose $\displaystyle p(x) > 0 $ on $\displaystyle \mathcal{R}$.

    (i) If $\displaystyle u$ is a solution of

    $\displaystyle \bigtriangledown^2 u = p(x) u \ \ x \in \mathcal{R} \ \ \bigtriangledown \cdot n = 0 \ \x \in \partial \mathcal{R}$

    show that $\displaystyle u \equiv 0$ on $\displaystyle \mathcal{R}$

    (ii) If $\displaystyle u$ is a solution of

    $\displaystyle \bigtriangledown^2 u = p(x) u \ \ x \in \mathcal{R} \ \ \bigtriangledown \cdot n = g(x) \ \x \in \partial \mathcal{R}$

    show that $\displaystyle u$ is unique (It can be assumed that part (i) is true).
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Joined
    Aug 2010
    From
    Queenstown
    Posts
    16
    I haven't made any progress on this one, but this is Poisson's equation, isn't it? And its inhomogenous? I think I need to use Greens identity to solve this. Is that right?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Super Member Rebesques's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2005
    From
    My house.
    Posts
    658
    Thanks
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by OliviaB View Post
    Hi,
    I am really struggling with a subject at my university which is all about partial differential equations. It takes me a long time to understand even the most basic concepts, and I really need some help understanding and completing the following questions.

    Let $\displaystyle \mathcal{R}$ be a bounded region in $\displaystyle \mathbb{R}^3$, and suppose $\displaystyle p(x) > 0 $ on $\displaystyle \mathcal{R}$.

    (i) If $\displaystyle u$ is a solution of

    $\displaystyle \bigtriangledown^2 u = p(x) u \ \ x \in \mathcal{R} \ \ \bigtriangledown \cdot n = 0 \ \x \in \partial \mathcal{R}$

    show that $\displaystyle u \equiv 0$ on $\displaystyle \mathcal{R}$

    (ii) If $\displaystyle u$ is a solution of

    $\displaystyle \bigtriangledown^2 u = p(x) u \ \ x \in \mathcal{R} \ \ \bigtriangledown \cdot n = g(x) \ \x \in \partial \mathcal{R}$

    show that $\displaystyle u$ is unique (It can be assumed that part (i) is true).


    Well, it looks like a typical application of the Lax-Milgram theorem to me.

    The weak formulation of this problem on $\displaystyle L^2(\mathcal{R})$ reads

    $\displaystyle \int_{\mathcal{R}}(\bigtriangledown u)^2v=\int_{\mathcal{R}}puv,\ \forall v\in L^2(\mathcal{R})$

    or, by integrating the left hand side by parts and using the boundary conditions,

    $\displaystyle \int_{\mathcal{R}}[\langle \nabla u,\nabla v\rangle+puv]=0$.

    Define the bilinear form on $\displaystyle L^2(\mathcal{R})\times L^2(\mathcal{R})$,

    $\displaystyle \alpha(u,v)=\int_{\mathcal{R}}[\langle \nabla u,\nabla v\rangle+puv]$.

    To show that $\displaystyle \alpha(u,v)=0$ is solvable for some $\displaystyle u$, we can invoke the Lax-Milgram theorem: We need just show that $\displaystyle \alpha$ is bounded and coercive.

    You can show it is bounded, ie there exists a $\displaystyle B>0$ such that

    $\displaystyle |\alpha(u,v)|\leq B||u||||v||$, where $\displaystyle ||u||^2=\int_{\mathcal{R}}u^2+|\nabla u|^2.$

    As for $\displaystyle \alpha$ being coercive, we must show there is $\displaystyle C>0$ with $\displaystyle \alpha(u,u)\geq C||u||^2$. We compute

    $\displaystyle \alpha(u,u)=\int_{\mathcal{R}}|\nabla u|^2+pu^2\geq\min\{1,\inf_{\mathcal{R}} p\}||u||^2$.


    Now the Lax-Milgram theorem applies, and there is a $\displaystyle u_0\in L^2(\mathcal{R})$ such that
    $\displaystyle \alpha(u_0,v)=0 \ \forall v\in L^2(\mathcal{R})$.
    And reflexivity implies $\displaystyle u_0=0$.

    For part ii), consider two solutions $\displaystyle u_1,u_2\in L^2(\mathcal{R})$ of the problem at hand.
    Then their difference $\displaystyle u_1-u_2$ is a solution for the problem given in part i), and therefore must be zero.






    Ps. You cannot construct a Green's function here, as zero is an eigenvalue for $\displaystyle -\bigtriangledown^2+p$ on a region.
    Last edited by Rebesques; Oct 18th 2010 at 09:11 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Really struggling! Please Help.
    Posted in the Statistics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Oct 1st 2010, 02:13 PM
  2. i am struggling with this, can anyone help
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Apr 25th 2010, 06:28 AM
  3. Bit of help, struggling with this.
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Apr 20th 2010, 11:47 PM
  4. Struggling with Calculus
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Nov 22nd 2008, 10:09 AM
  5. I'm struggling..
    Posted in the Pre-Calculus Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Oct 21st 2008, 05:51 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum